Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit The Grim Creeper's column >>

THE GRIM CREEPER

Articles Posted: 22  Links Seeded: 1459
Member Since: 12/2009  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Guess What? Obamacare Bill Raises Health Care Premiums

Seeded on Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:09 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: RushLimbaugh.com Home
health, democrats, rush-limbaugh, obamacare, pelosi, reid
Seeded by The Grim Creeper
Advertise | AdChoices

Guess what? Health care premiums and costs are going to skyrocket. From the American Spectator Prowler: "The economic report released last week by Health and Human Services, which indicated that President Barack Obama's health care 'reform' law would actually increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on consumers, had been submitted to the office of HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius more than a week before the Congressional votes on the bill, according to HHS sources, who added that Sebelius's staff refused to review the document before the vote was taken. 'The reason we were given was that they did not want to influence the vote,' says an HHS source. 'Which is actually the point of having a review like this, you would think.'"

So everybody knew. Everybody knew that Obamacare would ratchet up the cost. That news was suppressed. Sebelius didn't want to read it on purpose, saying she "didn't want to affect the vote," all of which is true. She knew the vote would be affected. There's the problem with this now. Well, it's a problem if the Republicans are on the game. The problem is that there are a lot of vulnerable Democrats, some in the Stupak coalition, others not. There are some who said specifically they voted for Obamacare "Because the CBO doesn't lie. We looked at the numbers. It lowers premiums, it lowers costs, and it lowers the deficits." There's about 12 to 15, maybe more Democrats, who said that -- over and over and over again. They are on record. Jim Geraghty, Campaign Spot, National Review Online, has a list of these guys and women and their quotes.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • The Grim Creeper's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: FOX NEWS, Reagan Conservatives, rightwingers, The Conservative Vine
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (94)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
The Grim Creeper

Here are some supporting articles:

• American Spectator: What Lies Beneath - The Prowler
• Sweetness & Light: AP: GOP Must Help Cut Obama-Care Cost
• Wall Street Journal: ObamaCare Mulligan
• Heritage Foundation: Our Research & Offerings on Health Care Reform

  • 17 votes
#1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:11 AM EDT
GaryColumbus

Well if Lush said it then we're all home free. I wonder what Lush wants to do next to better our country? Oh that's right. He's just a satirical bullsh1ter.

When are you righties going to realize your World doesn't start or end when Lush decides to loosen his sphincter and release your noses?

  • 21 votes
#1.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:14 AM EDT
rick-673281

I guess when you figure out that tax tax tax and spend spend spend doesnt work and never has for any country. Trillion dollar deficits per year now the highest they have ever been and now the largest entitlement program in our history to add onto those trillion dollar deficits. Whose going to pay them according to you I guess they will just go away or no one will ever notice them. Hell BO and company pass bills and dont even know what is in them and they tell us they are good for everyone and wont cost us a dime yea right LMFAO when has the government ever done anything that didnt cost the tax payers.

  • 16 votes
#1.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:24 AM EDT
CCArm

Hell BO and company pass bills and dont even know what is in them and they tell us they are good for everyone and wont cost us a dime yea right LMFAO when has the government ever done anything that didnt cost the tax payers.

Is that you Rush?

  • 14 votes
#1.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:35 AM EDT
Shawn [a.k.a. "Shadow"]

Well if Lush said it then we're all home free. I wonder what Lush wants to do next to better our country? Oh that's right. He's just a satirical bullsh1ter.

How quickly did you skim the vine article before formulating that opinion...or have you bothered to do ANY research into it? Just because Rush said it doesn't mean that it it's right...but it also doesn't mean that it's wrong. In fact, someone else also stated it (and is from the links provided):

Or maybe not so gradually, judging by the study released last last week by Richard Foster, the Obama Administration's Medicare actuary. Mr. Foster predicts net national health spending will increase by about 1% annually above the status quo that is already estimated to be $4.7 trillion in 2019. This is one more rebuke to the White House fantasy that a new entitlement will lower health costs.

Most of ObamaCare's unrealistic "savings" come from cranking down the way Medicare calculates its price controls, and Mr. Foster writes that they'll grow "more slowly than, and in a way that was unrelated to, the providers' costs of furnishing services to beneficiaries." He expects that 15% of hospital budgets may be driven into deficits, thus "possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries."

So while I will concede that Rush's saying it doesn't mean that it's true, will you agree that if Obama's own people are saying it, that it might be worth mentioning???

  • 22 votes
#1.4 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:38 AM EDT
Uthaclena

Such an impeccible source of accurate and unbiased information you have selected to seed this article! As I've noted in other comments over the last year, some of you should form a Newsvine group specifically for those of the position "EVERYTHING Obamao Does Is Wrong and We Will NEVER Accept Him As Our President Under ANY Circustances!!" By so doing, people who have legitimate policy and strategy difference with him among both conservatives and liberals (because we do) will be able to have meaningful debates without having to wade through the mindless rants. Although I have to admit that sometime you all are so over the top that it becomes truly entertaining!

  • 18 votes
#1.5 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:52 AM EDT
McSpocky

You found the info on RushLimbaugh.com and believe it? LOL

And you support your finding with links to those right wing reports? Check your facts somewhere that's not biased please.

  • 16 votes
#1.6 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:58 AM EDT
NEWS BULLETIN

Thanks for exposing yet another REPUBLICAN FAILURE, GrimCreeper.

Well, we already know that Obama's health care bill will reduce costs, but thanks again for reminding everyone and spreading the fact further and wider that it was Republicans fault that scuttled the public option, which would have reduced rates even further and fostered competition. And as for doing nothing, rates were *already* escalating by the republican coddled insurance companies anyway, by as much as 39%!

Thanks for publishing this and exposing that this is nothing to do with Obama but rather the fact that Rising Premiums are entirely the FAULT of Conservative Republicans.

Good work exposing Republicans for their failure on this, Grim Reaper!

  • 22 votes
#1.7 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:03 AM EDT
brave1forever

You know it's kinda sad when you all blame each side and you don't see what is in the middle..And that would be both sides are to blame NOT just one side..The way I see it is that if they want something to pass the parties put on a show and start to blame each side and then they bring the people in on it and no matter what we want they ALWAYS do what ever they want anyhow and make us pay for it.. Remember there either getting something out of it or there getting paid to vote a certain way. There all CROOKS. And there always voting for money not for the people.. We need to get rid of every single person in there and start voting real people into office like farmers, steel workers, and people of small business's everyday people who know how hard it is out here in the real world those are the people we need to put into office.. So stop falling for the puppet show and lets work together and find out who is going to stand up for the people not for there pocket book...

  • 5 votes
#1.8 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:24 AM EDT
irrepairDeleted
PfftWhatever!

Well, we already know that Obama's health care bill will reduce costs,

McSpocky & NB, good to see that you did not read any of the articles or posts above. As Shawn already stated, a study from Richard Foster, the Obama Administration's Medicare actuary, shows that the Health Care Bill will not reduce costs.

Mr. Foster predicts net national health spending will increase by about 1% annually above the status quo that is already estimated to be $4.7 trillion in 2019. This is one more rebuke to the White House fantasy that a new entitlement will lower health costs. Most of ObamaCare's unrealistic "savings" come from cranking down the way Medicare calculates its price controls, and Mr. Foster writes that they'll grow "more slowly than, and in a way that was unrelated to, the providers' costs of furnishing services to beneficiaries." He expects that 15% of hospital budgets may be driven into deficits, thus "possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries."

  • 7 votes
#1.10 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:40 AM EDT
tired of carrying everyone

It is strange that I see this now on the vine because on Friday MSNBC had it posted a very similar article for a very short time. I glossed through quickly at 7:30 AM and by 8:30 it had been removed. Sad thing is unlike our more niave left posters I always knew it was about money, power, and legacy. That is all it is about. Yeah the winds of change look like the same since 1992. Just two cents from one who has not voted for a president from either party starting with 1988. If you put them in a bag and shake it they all come out the exact way and that is they look alike. They are all money and power hungry indviduals just this last one has been known to hang with those that totally want to topple the United States Government.(examples Bill Ayers, Van Jones etc, etc etc.)

  • 8 votes
#1.11 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:43 AM EDT
Schroedingers Cat

No,No and again NO! the health care legislation itself DID NOT! The insurance cabal is raising rates and terminating policies in retaliation for Americans wanting to be treated fairly. WellPoint is terminating policies of women with breast cancer these insurance company death panels will continue this until only the wealthy can afford health care..and THAT is exactly what the Republicans want. Fail again Grim..when are you going to start supporting the American people in the struggle against the Right and their horrendous agenda.

  • 17 votes
#1.12 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:46 AM EDT
Krankee

Why don't you just quote health insurance executives Grim? Oh wait, Rush is paid to speak on their behalf so there is no need for that.

Rush Limbaugh frequently sites himself as a source. LOL He loves the sound of voice.

  • 18 votes
#1.13 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:52 AM EDT
Canadian Dave

Article source: RushLimbaugh.com

R&R&ROTFLMAO!!!

  • 11 votes
#1.14 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:04 AM EDT
GaryColumbus

Shadow and what the f ever.

In 2019 how much will health care costs and insurance rise annually on their own without Obamacare? I'll lay a wager it's much more than the puny little 1% you're making such a stink about. As far as hospitals losing 15% in budgets. Thus far only a possibility and not a proven fact. But a big freaking right wing spin and that's good enough for you. People wouldn't be jambing up the ERs at higher rates and tax payers covering those bills because those people couldn't afford to go anywhere else but the ER. I'd rather the hospitals lose 15% than We The People having to continue to pay those outrageous rates that we already are now. That is the essence of the reform to begin with. Saving tax payer dollars. And do you still think those rates won't go up without some reform? Dream on Lushbaughlians.

  • 12 votes
#1.15 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:08 AM EDT
Tim S.-560036

The "increase in premiums was known and publicized, by Obama himself at the summit. Why are you acting like this is breaking news? The increase is a result of minimum standards in coverage. What good is a policy that does not cover the most cost effective and efficient care? But when compared to the premiums for comparable coverage the premiums are lower.

  • 13 votes
#1.16 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:20 AM EDT
trex-138069

Rick, I don't know how to break this to you, but when Reagan cut taxes, the deficit soared. When Bush 41 raised taxes, and Clinton later did the same, the recession of the late 80's ended, and the deficit vanished. When Bush 43 cut taxes, the deficit skyrocketed to all time highs. Notice a pattern here? Sorry if this is challenging an article of religious faith for you, because supply siders act that way about their economic theory, which has never once worked in practice. But the earth revolves around the sun, and cutting taxes always raises the deficit, whether you like it or not.

  • 13 votes
#1.17 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:36 AM EDT
Ultima-858821

Let's say we don't do any analysis and just use our intuition based on past government programs, the Alinskyite approach to legislation, and the smoke and mirrors typically employed to make the numbers work. What is the result? We will pay and pay and pay for a program that is supposed to cost nothing. It's lies, lies, lies -- not matter who's telling them.

    #1.18 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:23 PM EDT
    800 lb. gorilla

    grim

    you just plagiarized rush limbaugh. the least you could do is to put quotes around your whole post. i thought that they were your words until i clicked on the related article.

    • 7 votes
    #1.19 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:42 PM EDT
    NEWS BULLETIN

    "brave1forever" wrote:"you all blame each side and you don't see what is in the middle..And that would be both sides are to blame NOT just one side..The way I see it is that if they want something to pass"=WRONG!

    It is Not correct that both sides wanted something to pass! You forget, it was the Republicans who are the party of NO, party of BLOCK EVERY ADVANCEMENT, and the party of FAILURE, that wanted NOTHING to pass! Nothing. So that condition was that YOUR health insurance rates were SKYROCKETING at a whopping 39 nearly 40%! a Year! So your entire premise is thrown out.

    Here's some MATH for you:

    Democrats = 1 , divide in the middle equals 1/2! Willing to meet in the middle!

    Republicans = 0, divide 0 by anything and you end up with a big skewed extremist ZERO!

    "Kill the Bill" remember that? Hmm? Republican Teabagger.

    Republicans ruined the public option(Republican FAILURE!), which would have lowered rates, as Obama wanted! Now, under Obama, EMERGENCY ROOM charges will be alleviated (Obama win), therefore insurance companies *could* decrease rates if Republicans hadn't brown-nosed them into raising them even more even despite that (Republican FAILURE!), insurance companies would have already gotten a "gift" of 40 million new customers! (Obama business win!), and children will be covered(Obama & Children and American Family win!).

    All sourpuss about your rates, hmm? Go whine to yourself in the mirror conservative teabagger because you did it to yourself, and socked it to your own family and child by derailing the public option. Just go put a hose from your own mouth to your own ear and whine about it. Your Fault.

    • 3 votes
    #1.20 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:01 PM EDT
    PfftWhatever!

    In 2019 how much will health care costs and insurance rise annually on their own without Obamacare? I'll lay a wager it's much more than the puny little 1% you're making such a stink about.

    Gary, you need to reread the information. It says Obama's Health Care Bill will raise rates an additional 1% over what the status quo would be. Do you understand now? Rates will be higher than if we did nothing.

      #1.21 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:37 PM EDT
      tweetheart44

      NEWS BULLETIN, If I am understanding your post, you are saying that the public option was the key to bringing DOWN insurance and health care costs. That is what I had thought all along. So, the Republicans don't let the public option pass, and now they are bitching because health care costs are going up. It's the Republicans fault, not President Obama's fault.

      • 4 votes
      #1.22 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:47 PM EDT
      NEWS BULLETIN

      PfftWhatever! tried to pull a fast one on everyone here, writing: "McSpocky & NB, good to see that you did not read any of the articles or posts above. As Shawn already stated, a study from Richard Foster, the Obama Administration's Medicare actuary, shows that the Health Care Bill will not reduce costs. 'Foster predicts net national health spending will increase by about 1% annually'"=FALSE!

      This is debunked. Look, ok, will go easy on you here since you are obviously new to this here. What you have done here even has a name to it. It's called CONFLATION! You've committed conflation. This is a post in which you discredit yourself by comparing 2 dissimilar items that are improperly related to one-another.

      Look mate, 'Costs' are not identical to 'spending'! You obviously don't know anything about business. Here, this will be an example for you. School is in session...

      Pretend you own a little LEMONADE STAND. It costs you 1 dollar, and the customer spends 2 on it when they purchase it from you. On the 1st day, 1 customer comes by, and buys 1. Ok, now, costs were 1 dollar! Spending was 2 dollars. Costs are not the same as spending, you are already debunked. Got it so far?

      Now, on Day 2, that same customer comes again. And he buys another one, only THIS TIME HE BRINGS 39 MILLION MORE CUSTOMERS WITH HIM! Ok. Now, guess what. Your costs just went UP. Now you have to buy 39million and one packets of lemonade and it just cost you 39 million and one dollars. Oh, and look, spending went up too! Oh, no Spending balooned up from 2 dollars to 78,000,002 dollars! Oh, gee, could it be because there are 39 million NEW customers generating NEW business each now able to purchase it and spend 2 dollars? Ahem. And guess what, Pfft, YOU as a business, just cleared 38,999,999 or nearly 40 MILLION Dollars in profit! Up from 1 dollar the day before. Ok. So under "ObamaCare" everyone benefits! Now, what the insurance companies are having the disgusting gall to do, is not LOWER rates even though they aren't having to cover EMERGENCY Rooms and because of improved rmedical ecords efficiency, fewer unnecessary CYA tests needed, etc, and they didn't even have the wherewithall to be thankful for MILLIONS more in profit from the addition of 40 million new customers, but since Republicans negated the public option, they now own all of the stands, and since they know you need the drink of water to survive and be healthy, these gougers have the gall that every time you come back they are RAISING the rates! $2 to $2.50, then 2.50 to $3.00, then doubling it to $4 the next time you look! And then who knows! That's what was happening. And insurance companies were playing seinfeld "SOUPNAZI" with your family's and children's lives with their pre-existing conditions, "rescission", and denial of coverage! Playing with people's lives. Any person cheering for Republicans, or insurance companies, or pre-existing conditions is promoting harm to American lives. Against Americans. But people's lives are not a game! People died because they did not have coverage for preventative care, or proper treatment! People died. REPUBLICAN FAIL!

      And with regard to any premiums UP, there is good reason for that too! Now, with preventative care available, people can AVOID getting some illnesses in the 1st place! And people who were formerly blocked from coverage, now have all kinds of programs and choices available! So even people who already had *some* coverage might look now and say, "Oh, wow, now I can buy dental, vision, preventative, wow! Hey! I wouldn't even mind buying some of those new things available! Even if I have to pay more than I did before, I'm going to CHOOSE to do so because now I can!" Under ObamaCare now you have CHOICE!

      Ok, school is out. Go home. Do your homework, sections 1 through 14.

      • 2 votes
      #1.23 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:56 PM EDT
      JoulesBeef

      funny as @!$%# to see the borrow and spend GOP.. get pissed over health care costs that will rise less than they would have without the bill.

      funny as @!$%# the racist GOP calling the dems fiscally irresponcible when they unified in opposition to paygo.. you know the thing they had to repeal so they wouldnt have to pay for @!$%# for 8 years.. as they tried to starve the beast.

      and starve the beast IS NOT A LIBERAL LIE.. it is the GOP ideology.

      Terrorists could only dream of being as harmful to the US as the GOP are.

      notice they had zero problems passing medicare plan D? cause they diont give a @!$%# about paying for it.. and they want you to think this is good for america.

      • 2 votes
      #1.24 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:40 PM EDT
      NEWS BULLETIN

      tweetheart44 WROTE:

      "NEWS BULLETIN, If I am understanding your post, you are saying that the public option was the key to bringing DOWN insurance and health care costs. That is what I had thought all along. So, the Republicans don't let the public option pass, and now they are bitching because health care costs are going up. It's the Republicans fault, not President Obama's fault."

      #1.22 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:47 PM EDT

      CORRECT!!

      Tweetheart44, you get an A! And a gold star too. :)

      Yes, you see, WITH the public option, then the customer has a choice, that means competition! So when the public option offers abc for $123 then the insurance company has to do something to make that customer WANT to buy from the company rather than the public option, so, that means the company has to either give the customer (YOU) a lower price to get you to buy it from them (lower rates!) or, give you better care and coverage!

      You win, your family wins, the insurance company wins because they just got 40 million more customers woth of business, businesses would spend millions on advertising to obtain that, look at the superbowl! Underinsured win, they now can buy more full-featured plans, the uninsured win, they can now live, and have insurance at all, ObamaCare is something to be proud of!

      But what you said is exactly right. Republicans, (who by the way would have had THEIR insurance permiums even lower too!) pulled this fiasco of scaring the elderly saying people were out to 'kill grandma', and that embarassment Palin factually incorrect talking about her 'death panels', and Teabaggers gloating around with signs boasting the oxymoronic "Socialized Medicine Keep your Hands off my Medicare!" signs, and Republican John Boner, Chuck GrASSley, and so forth throwing a fit, claiming "Armageddon is coming!!" and ruining the public option, so now there is less competition, the insurance companies now have No impetus to lower their rates as much, and Republicans did it to everyone and themselves too, and are now complaining about it.

      Remember also! Rush Limbaugh the pied piper of the Republican Party is a man who was on drugs!

      Rush Limbaugh was caught engaged in drug abuse! This man was giving his radio show and coming up with all his things, everything that came out of his mouth, for years, and YEARS, all the while his brain was under the influence of drugs. And these people Republicans absorbed all that, believed it, which very well could be drug-influenced, and a few continue to be suckered in by this drug-influenced Humpty-Dumpty sitting in his chair. That's why so many people on here are laughing that someone actually seeded an article from him. :)

      • 4 votes
      #1.25 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:19 PM EDT
      GaryColumbus

      It says Obama's Health Care Bill will raise rates an additional 1% over what the status quo would be. Do you understand now? Rates will be higher than if we did nothing.

      Of course I understand. I don't believe it and I'm calling y'all liars.

      • 1 vote
      #1.26 - Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:33 PM EDT
      800 lb. gorilla

      gary

      now there is an honest assessment.

      • 1 vote
      #1.27 - Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:26 PM EDT
      James Andre

      everything that came out of his mouth, for years, and YEARS, all the while his brain was under the influence of drugs. And these people Republicans absorbed all that, believed it, which very well could be drug-influenced, and a few continue to be suckered in by this drug-influenced Humpty-Dumpty sitting in his chair.

      Nutshell!

      • 3 votes
      #1.28 - Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:57 PM EDT
      Reply
      The Grim Creeper

      How many times are the people going to fall for this dog and pony show? Why do we always have to hear the truth AFTER a bad bill becomes a law?

      • 17 votes
      Reply#2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:13 AM EDT
      The Spirit

      As Pelosi said, we'll find out what's in the bill after we pass it. And libs had NO problem with that.

      • 16 votes
      #2.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:49 AM EDT
      Rank on Rank

      Grim Creeper,

      Is there a direct correlation between the new Health Care Reform signed into law by the President and this increase in premiums? Or how about, does the new law mandate increases in health insurance premiums?

      The answer to both questions is a resounding "No". It is the Insurance companies that are solely responsible for raising their premiums.

      How long will you keep up your "dog and pony show" with the facts?

      • 24 votes
      #2.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:01 AM EDT
      trex-138069

      "How many times are people going to fall for this dog and pony show?" That's what I have to wonder every time I hear someone quote Rush Limbaugh. This is the same guy who was bloviating about how the miners at the Upper Big Branch died because their union failed to get proper safety measures enforced -- without ever bothering to check whether they HAD a union. They didn't -- the management had strongarmed them with threats to close the mine if they organized. Three things you can be sure of about Rush: he will say absolutely anything if he thinks it makes Democrats look bad, he will never check his facts, and he will never retract a false statement.

      • 28 votes
      #2.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:06 AM EDT
      KellyBoDeleted
      irrepairDeleted
      trex-138069

      Then maybe it's time to pass a few reforms to the health care bill. Now that there's a foundation in place, we can build on it.

      • 11 votes
      #2.6 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:36 AM EDT
      coloradoan-1141358

      irrepair,

      Not that I'm defending them, but I don't believe that the repubs had enough votes to knock down anything?

      • 2 votes
      #2.7 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:00 PM EDT
      JoulesBeef

      How many times are the people going to fall for this dog and pony show? Why do we always have to hear the truth AFTER a bad bill becomes a law?

      @!$%#ing lol.. if you think the "truth" is anywhere near a half dozen right wing links... you havent been paying attention for over a decade.

      tell me this my friend.. find the section of the bill that forces granney and trigg to commit suicide?

      how abotu this.. you find the WMDS east west and north of bagdad?

      still think when we are talking about wire taps we are talking warrants?

      still believe that crap?

      Sorry man.. i have never read the truth from a republican biased link.. and nothing even close to reality in the past year and most of america sees that..

      yall love to quote health care polls.. how about go look at any poll you want.. rasmuessen included./. and tell me how the american people feel about leaving it in the GOPs hands.

      • 2 votes
      #2.8 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
      JoulesBeef

      Not that I'm defending them, but I don't believe that the repubs had enough votes to knock down anything?

      really?

      first the dems never had 60 seats.. they had 58.. and now 57.. there were 2 indpendants.

      unlike the GOP the dems dont vote in lockstep.. thats why through out history the GOP have never had to fight for a dem vote.. they can get three or 4.

      now the dems in congress who happen to the the top 5% in income people, have to vote agasint their best self interests to help the little people..

      it tends to be easier to make sure that they dont have 60 votes when the people who have to pay for this crap are the same ones voting for it.


      what should make you ill.. not one of these GOPrs in this thread, gave a @!$%# that republicans in congress held up critical obama appointments, FOR EARMARKS..
      thats right the GOP in congress.. you know the oens freaking out about earmarks and complaining obama lied when ever there is one in the bill.. demanded that obama give them earmarks.. in order for them to stop blocking a nomineee.

      • 2 votes
      #2.9 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:46 PM EDT
      James Andre

      I don't believe that the repubs had enough votes to knock down anything?

      Actually, in the Senate they do.

      Bills have to make it out of committee, through procedure, and then to the floor. Republicans have exercised every single procedure to prevent any Dem legislation.

      • 3 votes
      #2.10 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:24 PM EDT
      800 lb. gorilla

      filibuster!

      • 1 vote
      #2.11 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:27 PM EDT
      Reply
      Jason-632265

      So one group of people had 'proof' that the healthcare system would increase costs to consumers. There were 100 others just like them and another 100 who had proof the opposite would happen. Thats why it took so long to get anything done with the bill. Truth is nobody knows, there are just too many factors to account for in a model, the result could go either way based on certain scenarios. Basic economic principles seem to support the fact that the premiums would go down but again nobody knows.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:42 AM EDT
      rick-673281

      "Truth is nobody knows"

      Only if you cant add 1 plus pne no body knows. You cant add 36 million people plus another 10-12 million if BO gets his way with amnesty and not raise costs. You dont have to be a CPA to figure that one out. The cuts in medicare wont happen unless they cut back on seniors alot and all this fraud they are suppose to find wont happen either. So where does all this extra money we will need come from? No other place to get it then from the tax payers. So to say "nobody knows" well only if you hide your head in the sand.

      • 6 votes
      #3.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:16 AM EDT
      Jason-632265

      Your right man, it is exactly that simple, that is why the top minds in the areas of finance and economics in this country can't come to a consenus on it, they should have just called you and saved everyone a bunch of time and inconvenience.

      • 11 votes
      #3.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:19 AM EDT
      JoulesBeef

      everythign to the right is that @!$%#ing simple.
      it is alll black and white to them

      they seem to ignore the medicare cuts and the medicare advantage cuts and the fact we wont have to pay for millions of people to get basic care in the emergency room../

      dont ya know.. adding more people .. always costs more.. please ignore the fact that teh Dems increased taxes and cut programs to actually pay for it..

      it is black and white and black is bad.

      • 1 vote
      #3.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
      Reply
      Simon Templar-791084

      Here is the sad part for the article and those on the right cheering the fact that premiums have increased. Most of this discussion will be due to ignorance.. and I am sorry for saying that in advance. It is common knowledge among industry insiders that the Health Care bill itself is not responsible for raising rates. Most of the people who work closely with medical capitation risk adjustment understand in advance that the health care companies are using the greater pool of higher "health risk scores" to justify rate increases. It does not mean they spend any more money to insure people, nor does it follow that this greater pool of members have chronic conditions that merit more coverage. What it means is this... for those who are tapdancing in thier seats, reading articles that truly do not share the gist of why rates have changed...... It means that not only is there a potential for an insurer's costs to change... but it means that the revenue they generate from each person enrolled increases exponentially. Any fool knows most major insurance companies generate revenue from the Medicare Advantage program, and before they submit a claim to one of the five processes... the have risk adjustment analysts , medical coders, and other staff examine the trends and develop a health risk score for each participant... the higher the health risk score.. the greater the return from Medicare Advantage.. I can personally tell you they profit at a minimum an amount of 5 to 1. Which means for every dollar they spend on your treatment.. they get 5 back from the Feds. This is the unabashed truth.. However most industry insiders like myself knew in advance they would probably raise rates, because they could.. not because the cost of insuring more people increased.... but just the "RISK" associated with the new member pool was enough to pass it on to the consumer.

      What the fools who posted this article do not know or understand.. is... Obama is not the demon... Just log on line... Look at the margin, and total annual sales of some of the country's biggest insurer's... you will see thier quarterly portfolio continue to increase.. especially if they are publicly held.. it is the only way to keep investment dollars flowing into the capital reserve. lmao

      We need to all grow the hell up, get the hell off the partisanship bandwagon.. and sensationalized headlines... and dig deeper for factual information. It's totally ridiculous.

      • 24 votes
      Reply#4 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:01 AM EDT
      trex-138069

      Thanks for the explanation, but people who listen to Rush will never make it through. WAY too technical, and it doesn't give them a quick, easy answer to the question "Who do we blame?"

      • 18 votes
      #4.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:08 AM EDT
      JoulesBeef

      "this goes against everything I believe so I will ignore it" thanks - GOP.

      the big difference between dems and GOPRs these days since they are both right wingers.

      TEH dems believe in evidence based governing.. the GOP believe in emotional based governing. Or more to the point.. do what ever the @!$%# you want except actually govern by getting peoples emotions worked up on things that are not even problems.

      OMG OBAMA HAS CZARS AND IS GOING TO HAND US OVER TO RUSSIA.. YOU JUST WATCH.

      doesnt matter one bit bush had more.

      Turning us over to russia , envokes emotions by the easily controllable GOP base.

      • 2 votes
      #4.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:53 PM EDT
      Reply
      cpg

      Guess what? Rates were jacked way up before Obamacare too. Sounds like the message is that regardless of the situation, health care rates will go up. This is exactly why regulation is needed.

      • 18 votes
      Reply#5 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:13 AM EDT
      molemanisalive

      Too bad congress didn't regulate insurance rates, but they did manage to mandate a whole bunch of new people for the insurance companies to profit off of, didn't they? The only reform enacted that I agree with is that insurance companies can no longer deny coverage to anyone for any reason, everything else was a waste of time and meaningless. The reform most needed was to regulate insurance premiums and increases, the government failed us yet again, big surprise....

        #5.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:50 PM EDT
        Ken Pac NW

        The reform most needed was to regulate insurance premiums and increases

        And this is one of the things the Republicans were against, claiming "free market" interference by the government.

        BTW, Has Rush left for Costa Rico yet?

        • 3 votes
        #5.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:17 PM EDT
        JoulesBeef

        molemanisalive

        I guess you also disagree with teh fact that administration costs are now limited and they cant just give their ceo raises every year. They actually have to spend most of their profits on health care.

        that was worthless as well right?

        I guess you dont like the closing of the doughnut hole.. that left our seniors in danger once a year as they had to choose between meds and food.. often choosing food and screwing up a procedure their doc is trying to get through..

        yeah lets put seniors back into the doughnut hole.

        I guess it is also bad.. that insurance companies can not simply raise your rates year after year cause you got sick trying to force you to willingly quit.

        yeah that was bad as well huh.

        want a few more or want to admit the their is more good in the bill than just preexisting condition care?

        • 1 vote
        #5.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:57 PM EDT
        molemanisalive

        Ken Pac,

        I don't care about Rush Limbaugh, never have, never will, never listened to his radio show.

        But if the government is going to mandate everyone buy health insurance, then they have a duty to regulate the cost structure of policies and control premiums, otherwise, we will all be paying through the roof for insurance. Just remember that it is the democrats that pushed through this fiasco just to get something done, regardless of how it affected anyone, and they exempted themselves and their staff from it all.

          #5.4 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:03 PM EDT
          NEWS BULLETIN

          molemanisalive WROTE: "Ken Pac, Just remember that it is the democrats that pushed through this fiasco just to get something done, regardless of how it affected anyone, and they exempted themselves and their staff from it all."

          This is like if you had to put food on the table for your grandmother, and you had a healthy sandwich, and some nutritious vegetables rich in protein and vitamins, and then a cup of tea, and then a REPUBLICAN comes along and spits in your her drink. Tainting one part of it. Now there's no replacment, so you're forced to give it to her because she needs to eat and the only other option, not giving her ANYTHING, could mean her getting sick or even her death. And then some Republican coming along and going Aha! look at what those 'dems' did! Shame on 'them'!

          Republicans tainted the bill, and sunk (some of) the things in it that were beneficial, and spat in it. Tons of other things in the bill are still NECESSARY to take care of hundreds and hundreds of millions of American citizens, save American families from 39% rate hikes that were happening anyway, eliminate pre-existing conditions, stop insurance companies from committing rescission, denial of coverage, stopping insurance companies from refusal to insure people who have things like cancer, saving children's lives, and fixing the seniors' doghnut hole (damn! the elderly chose FOOD instead??), and elimination of having to cover Emergency rooms, etc, and helping 40 million american lives who weren't covered.

          So now, in order to get all those critical good things for the American people, EVERYONE, not democrats, EVERYONE now needs to put up with the Republican spit. If they'd have cut the jr high school level crap and helped pass the bill, and not blemished it with Republican taint, then you'd not have any such problem! It's the Republicans fault! And any "polls" indicating any such 'displeasure' with the bill neglect to mention that a huge portion of the nays are people who say the bill didn't go far ENOUGH! They wanted the republican crap less, and wanted the Democrats to go FURTHER! Which was not possible due to the Republican filibustering! Remember, Republicans are the ones who spat in the bill, they shot down the public option which would have reduced rates. So don't ever blame democrats or granny, or anyone else for having to put up with the Republicans part. The rest of us will eat the rest of the great meal, and "Dont drink the TEA". We'll skip the tea, thank you. But the rest of ObamaCare is great! And could have been even better without greasy Republican fingers getting into the kitchen!

          Republicans are the ones who mucked up the public option, whined about co-ops, cried socialism on insurance company premium rate control, and everything mentioned. And had their chance to ADD good amendments to the bill but REFUSED! Hurting America and the American people.

          Republicans' Fault!

          • 2 votes
          #5.5 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:30 PM EDT
          molemanisalive

          news bulletin,

          Just in case you missed it, my point was that the democrats just wanted to make history and rammed through a poorly crafted bill, because they could, rather than take the time to craft the bill that would have solved all of our woes with insurance and medical care costs. The democrats even said that it wasn't perfect, so why pass it rather than hammer out the impurities and create a bill that would be perfect? Why ram a bill through the system so fast that most senators and representatives, let alone the citizens, have a chance to read the whole bill, and understand it? The democrats are playing partisan politics just as much as the republicans are. Blame falls on both sides. I have taken my lumps, now take yours.

          • 1 vote
          #5.6 - Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:07 AM EDT
          Ken Pac NW

          molemanisalive

          We heard a lot of "start over" from the GOP during the last months of the HCR debate, which history clearly shows would have killed reform for another 50, 100 years?

          The bill was watered down due to some Democrats but it was the Republicans that kept demanding changes, many of which were granted, but continued to vote no.

          The fact that it was "rammed" through means that we now have a base with which to work from, rather than waiting years before another bill is crafted.

          This bill is actually a perfect icon demonstrating fundamental differences in governing philosophy between the Dems & Repubs. The left wants universal care, the right wants market driven health care. The result is the current bill. Not perfect, no new bill is, but at least a place to start.

            #5.7 - Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:23 AM EDT
            Tim S.-560036

            But if the government is going to mandate everyone buy health insurance, then they have a duty to regulate the cost structure of policies and control premiums, otherwise, we will all be paying through the roof for insurance.

            Nope. What you will have is a time period for anger to build. At a time in that future, you will see true reform, a public option open to everyone regardless of current coverage or a single payer medicare type system. But first you will see the insurance industry given time and rope enough to commit suicide through greed and avarice. Long may they suffer for the pain and suffering they have caused.

              #5.8 - Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:56 AM EDT
              Reply
              Bubba-939441

              But Nancy said we needed to spend 950 billion to address rising health care costs. You libs been had, so has the entire country. We'll be paying more and receiving less.

              • 7 votes
              Reply#6 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:17 AM EDT
              McSpocky

              Sorry to burst your bubble, but we will be paying less and receiving more. Go somewhere neutral to check the facts, not FAUX news or Limbaugh.

              • 12 votes
              #6.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:07 AM EDT
              NEWS BULLETIN

              RIGHT WING REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVES RUINED THE PUBLIC OPTION.

              People were already paying more, and getting less. In fact, less people were getting anything at all. With Obama, now EVERYONE is getting something, and that includes children. With pre-existing conditions. Maybe even your own child could have been affected. (You're not against helping terminally ill children, are you? Yes, you very well could be, but that tells more about you then.)

              The Public Option would have lowered rates even further. Brilliant! Obama wanted the public option. And rates would have been even pleasantly lower.

              Republican Conservative Teabaggers hemmed and hawed and ruined the Public Option. Republicans are the ones at Fault for any raised rates. They are the ones who peed in your glass. So drink your own creation and then go to nearest mirror and commence your whining.

              No line about raised premiums or rates can ever be used again. The Republicans tainted the public option and therefore are responsible. If any Conservative or Teabagger ever attempts this argument again, it will simply double back on them and snap themselves in the face. Like this one just did. Entire submission has been discredited. Republicans' Fault.

              • 13 votes
              #6.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:25 AM EDT
              Bubba-939441

              Republicans didn't ruin anything. Dems had the majority and couldn't get enough of their own votes.

              • 1 vote
              #6.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:16 PM EDT
              molemanisalive

              McSpocky,

              Please provide us with a link to a neutral site that has the facts and what the endgame results are on what this bill will cost us in taxes and insurance premiums.

              Thanks,

              Moleman

                #6.4 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:53 PM EDT
                JoulesBeef

                LOL repukicans are allergic to facts.. it does no good to tell them to look @!$%# up somewhere besides rush.

                DONT YOU KNOW EVERYWHERE AND EVERYONE, INCLUDING REPUBLICANS, WHO TELL THEM WHAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO HEAR ARE COMMUNISTS HELL BENT ON DESTROYING AMERICA.

                seriously look at how they bitched at how liberally unfair we were for dare posting the uncut interview with palin that she agreed to do.

                OMG is was so liberal and unfair to ask her what magazines she read and he foreign policy experience.

                Yall were being vial biased hateful liberal jerks by airing her answers to those questions.

                they really have no use for facts.. if it disagrees with what they are saying it is a liberal lie.

                • 1 vote
                #6.5 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:01 PM EDT
                molemanisalive

                Yes, Palin is a moron, we all know. If she ends up being on the republican ticket in 2012 I will be voting independent.

                • 1 vote
                #6.6 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:05 PM EDT
                Reply
                AlphaDogReporter

                Only Republicans could make a mountain out of 9/10ths of a percent.

                • 13 votes
                Reply#7 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:33 AM EDT
                JoulesBeef

                over a decade..you know the same decade they said that if we did nothing they would double.

                this is very simular to the GOP attacking obama for investigating goldman.. cause didnt you know goldman contributed to his campaign.

                Only with republicans does busting a campaign supporter.. show bias.

                • 1 vote
                #7.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:02 PM EDT
                Reply
                Borncorn

                These right wing nuts say we can pay our doctor bills with chickens. And they expect to be taken seriously?

                • 15 votes
                Reply#8 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:20 AM EDT
                JoulesBeef

                I really wouldnt take less of a meat than bacon for my services.

                  #8.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:03 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  KitKat51

                  Really?? Puhleessee. Source is Rush Limbaugh... nothing valid here.

                  • 9 votes
                  Reply#9 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:24 AM EDT
                  germxo1Deleted
                  yes I CAN

                  The goal is gonna be the carrot and the stick......If you want to join say a smoking cessation program then your premium will go down ...Or join a health club and lose the weight then less hit to your pocketbook in regards to your health costs ....Thats the Schtiick !!!!! Obamacare......Money talks and bullcrap walks when it comes to you taking care of your own heath .....Carrot and stick .....Dont have the cupcake on the stick or youll have to pay a healthcare fine !!!!!!!

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#11 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:57 AM EDT
                  Another Texan

                  Although I don't care for the healthcare legislation, I don't recall ever hearing that it was going reduce costs. I did hear that it was an attempt to curtail the rapid increase in costs that was already occuring without HCR. I am not sure it will even do that, but I guess we will find out soon enough.

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#12 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:29 AM EDT
                  JoulesBeef

                  actually this is exactly what this report claims.

                  before HCR these folks said health care premiums would double in ten years.

                  now they say they will go up 1%.

                  to the GOP.. this is bad news.,

                  • 1 vote
                  #12.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:06 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  JJ-317453

                  Anyone believe this?

                  The space between the ears of Rush "bin Laden" Limbaugh is a "no-fly" zone. Ideas don't have a chance.

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#13 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:33 AM EDT
                  trex-138069

                  The closed mind is like a door that opens outward, so that the pressure of facts against it only brace it more firmly shut. Rush is Exhibit A.

                  • 5 votes
                  #13.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:38 AM EDT
                  Reply
                  Druswid

                  You know what I'd love? If the Republicans are so worried that the health care bill is going to raise premiums, why don't they come and work with Obama so they can both make a bipartisan effort to make the bill the best it can be? How about bringing back the public option/single payer? The repeal idea is unfeasible; if the bill got repealed, we'd go back to the same system we had before, and it would need reform all over again! The Republicans need to put up or shut up.

                  • 7 votes
                  Reply#14 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:10 AM EDT
                  J. W. Welch

                  Druswid

                  Good idea. Too bad the repubs won't get together with the dems and take on the insurance companies, big pharma and the health care industry in general.

                  It goes without saying that neither party is going to do anything to turn off the money spigot that funds their lifestyles. And a concerted assault on these enemies would do just that.

                  Like I said, good idea but reelection is more important than a healthy and financially viable populace.

                  • 1 vote
                  #14.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:10 PM EDT
                  Druswid

                  Yeah, you've got a point in that neither party seems to have any idea as to how to really rein in spending, and when you've got a two party system (until a third or more becomes really viable), bipartisanship is the ultimate goal. There should be an equal give and take going on, no matter which party is in office; you use some of the Dems ideas, and you use some of the Repubs ideas, it doesn't have to be just one party's ideas all the time, but I can't see them really cooperating, as much as it's to be hoped for. Ideally, the government should work for the good of the country as a whole, because when all of the citizens of the country prosper, instead of just some, the country flourishes, and when the country flourishes, so do the politicians. I just don't understand how people can't see past their own greedy noses to see that there's a way everybody can win, if they work on it together. The system is only going to further stagnate if the balance of power just keeps flipping from one party to the other.

                  • 1 vote
                  #14.2 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:19 PM EDT
                  JoulesBeef

                  Yeah, you've got a point in that neither party seems to have any idea as to how to really rein in spending, and when you've got a two party system (until a third or more becomes really viable), bipartisanship is the ultimate goal.

                  Dems gave us paygo and surpluses.
                  gop repealed paygo and turned surplsues into multi trillion dollar deficits.

                  dems reinstated paygo to nearly 100% GOP opposition.

                  the dems passed romenycare/.. the GOPs idea for 1996 agaisnt hilary care.. and the GOPs idea for 2009.. against the dems public option.. got zero votes from teh GOP.

                  teh stimulous.. dems wanted infrastructure rebuilding.. the gop wanted tax cuts.. we gave them 40% tax cuts.. and got no votes from the GOP.

                  teh GOP demanded we cut payroll taxes to fix jobs.. we cut payroll taxes and got maybe 3 GOP votes.

                  we have been doing almost exclusively the right wing republican ideas.. and still get zero votes from the GOP.. not so sure how much more bipartisan you can get besides let the GOP write it themselves all by themselves.

                  this is totally unlike the 109th that would not let dems read bills or add admendments.. and would shut off power to dems meeting on said bills.. yeah yall are soooooo funny.

                  • 1 vote
                  #14.3 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:11 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Marcel Villa

                  What does Russ think. You get something for free? I believe I read in the vine before that 47% of americans earning over $50,000/yr don't pay a single cent in taxes. It is in this segment of the society who will be vehemently against the tax. They get so used to not paying that they must feel it is a right not just a privileged for them to get government benefits and must not pay for it. It was written that the tax will be enormous but they really would not really say so. With the American population of over 220 Million the increase in tax would not even exceed $100 per year at the most and it would even be in the target range of probably $20-30/yr. Think again. This kind of money for a hell of a lot of health benefits. This money a person can easily spend in the bar in one sitting. These people are trying to scare americans and making a molehill look like a mountain. Even Canadians who have a better health care benefit package than what was passed by the present american administration, their tax bracket is just barely over the U.S. tax bracket per person and yet the population of Canda is barely a 4th of the U.S. Americans were lucky to have started this health care reform and if it will not fit then there is room for revisions. At least, the first hurdle have been addressed by the present administration. It is a dream come true for every americans since no administration were able to get past it because of unfounded and unnecessary opposition.Think again EXXON earning billions in profit and not a single penny for taxes. Time to change the picture.

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#15 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:18 AM EDT
                  AlphaDogReporter

                  What is really funny is that health care costs WITHOUT reform were projected to be going up 4-4.5% over the same period. I'll take 9/10th's of a percent.

                  Also there is no mention of the huge tax credits that the middle class is getting to defray the costs of buying health insurance.

                  Of course Rush is a hater, don't forget he is also the one that said no one in the U.S. was dying because they didn't have health insurance.

                  • 8 votes
                  Reply#16 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:34 AM EDT
                  Really

                  LoL... it does not take Rush to tell us what we already knew long before this Bill ever became law. We are talking about Washington here and not a business that would find themselves Bankrupt and gone betting on another Progressive Social Experiment. Any Progressives want to enlighten us all on any Social Program the our Government has ever estimated correctly and one that is actually saving us money? Now please explain how it will be all different this time around? I only have to look at our past to know this Administration is full or crap.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#17 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:39 AM EDT
                  Marcel Villa

                  Really,
                  Perhaps I can explain the benefits of a better health care. Right now there are millions of sick people in America who are not getting proper health care but is just getting by. They are not dead but are being maintained through the help of their siblings, relatives, etc. In short most of the money goes to the medical sector and the drug companies. This is a very small sector of the industry and thus could hire a limited number of people. If by the introduction of the new health care system and more people get looked after and get well, these people can either find meaningful work, buy new clothes, new shoes, go to restaurant more often, cinemas, etc. In short, the money will be spent in such a diversified way that the amount of jobs available for the unemployed will be far more than before. Taxes being paid to the government will increase thus enabling the govt. to legislate more tax deductions, etc. I still remember one time during my studies where the teacher said: a sick person is a burden, 100 times more than a healthy person. A healthy person is the equivalent of 100 sick person in bed in terms of return in investment. It might be an overstatement, I still believe in that and I think it is true up to now. Don't you think so?

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#18 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:54 AM EDT
                  reddirthippy

                  Indeed, 'Yellow Journalism' has been defined as having any or all of five characteristics:

                  Scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news

                  Lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings

                  Use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts

                  Emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips (which is now normal in the U.S.)

                  Dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.

                  Well that describes Newsmax, fox news, and the article linked to.

                  the article has a false picture and claims fighting the system.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#19 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:29 PM EDT
                  screamingeagle_bct

                  Folks, listen up - here's what's gonna happen. Insurance companies will have to raise rates in order to try to stay solvent. Ah - but that won't happen because we're going to have to control costs. Insurance companies will be on the brink of folding. Obama, if he's still around at that time, will publicly reprimand them for being so greedy in their business practices and chide the Republicans for allowing them to exercise their greed, then the feds will buy out the insurance companies. Thus the transition to Socialism will creep ever closer to us.

                  Thanks a whole @!$%#in' hell of a lot all you dumb @!$%#s that voted for this piece of crap we now have in Office.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#20 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:35 PM EDT
                  reddirthippy

                  Insurance companies will have to raise rates in order to try to stay solvent.

                  They have been able to cream for years. Medicaid, medicare and other gov. programs have covered the highest cost individuals. You have touched on an important point. The GOP goals have always been to privatize these (evil socialist)programs without the elimination of exclusion based on pre-existing conditons who would cover them. The rates would not be affordable to most people so as insurance does it spreads the cost over the population(customer base).

                  So you could look at this as a first step to privatizing.

                  • 1 vote
                  #20.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:59 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  jdjdjdjDeleted
                  Beckyal

                  Anyone who has any common sense knew that it was going to increase the cost of premiums. This is a no brainer for those that have a brain. For all seniors, you have been sacrificed by the younger generation so that they can have what they no longer want to work for. Sorry but those that support Obamacare you really deserve what you got, I just feel sorry for those who didn't support the massive tax and premium increase but are now are caught in the mess that those who supported it wanted. Why don't those that wanted the health care reform get out and work harded and send the money to charity to support the under insured so that rest of the people would not have been hurt. Use your common sense and stop trying to force your charity on us through taxation.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#22 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:13 PM EDT
                  APatriot-1099400

                  Let me bottom line this. The law passed. It's a done deal. Get over it! Now Rush and the Wacky Right can try to re-fight the battle, re-litigate the matter, argue about how it was passed, reconciliation, etc. but that's irrelevant now. It's the law of the land. They are trying to do the same thing Republicans did after Social Security and Medicare passed. They continue to whine and try to undermine the law for years afterward rather than work toward making the law better.

                  IF there are issues with how the law manages costs, offer an amendment to change it. Let the states manage the rates. Be a part of the process rather than blind opposition. That, and other provisions, could have been part of the bill if Republicans had chosen to cooperate rather than obstruct.

                  The Rush bunch obstructed and lied about the Bill during debate and now will obstruct and lie about the implementation of Health Care Reform, the same way they obstructed and lied about Medicare and Social Security. Twenty years from now Republicans will still be whining that they lost, wondering how they can overturn or obstruct.

                  Let me paraphrase where Rush and the Republicans are right now;

                  WHAAAAAAAAA!

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#23 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:22 PM EDT
                  Ken Pac NW

                  Maybe the righties are waiting to see the Health Reform Bill's "birth certificate" before they'll accept it as legitimate legislation!

                  And again, why hasn't Rush left the country? His taxes are too high, he hates the government and fears the encroaching socialism that is "destroying" his beloved nation.

                  One thing that I will give the man, he's discovered a way to make millions off of pure ignorance.

                  • 1 vote
                  #23.1 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:05 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  ReaperOne1Two2

                  Health care premiums and costs are going to skyrocket.

                  Oh, you mean they didn't and are just saying they will at some point in the future? Guess we can write a new article if there is a super-massive increase out of the normal sometime.

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#24 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:33 PM EDT
                  Undescribable

                  Rush said he was leaving the Country with Passage of what this article is about He doesn't do what he says so why would anyone publish what Rush has to say?

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#25 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:48 PM EDT
                  Little Sure Shot

                  "Health care premiums and costs are going to skyrocket." What part of this shocks people? Talk radio has been saying this for months.

                    Reply#26 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:08 PM EDT
                    adsfDeleted
                    ChicagoGMan

                    I still do not think the CBO lied, they just did not have all the facts and obvious repercussions to consider in their calculations. Kathleen Sebelius did not want to "sway" the vote with any data that conflicted with the President's agenda.

                      Reply#28 - Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:13 PM EDT
                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                      Newsvine Privacy Statement
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      FUN STUFF:
                      • Leaderboard |
                      • E-Mail Alerts |
                      • Top of the Vine |
                      • Newsvine Live |
                      • Newsvine Archives |
                      • The Greenhouse |
                      COMPANY STUFF:
                      • Code of Honor |
                      • Company Info |
                      • Contact Us |
                      • Jobs |
                      • User Agreement |
                      • Privacy Policy |
                      • About our ads
                      LEGAL STUFF:
                      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com